White Collar Criminal Defense • Boston, Massachusetts

White Collar Criminal Defense Litigation in Boston

Federal white-collar reference for Boston: the district court that hears federal fraud cases, the statutes that apply, and primary-source links — as part of the research archive.

White Collar Criminal DefenseDistrict of MassachusettsFederal Districtsresearch archive
White Collar Criminal Defense
Boston • D. Mass.

U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts

U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts

1 Courthouse Way, Boston, MA 02210

Federal fraud offenses arising in Boston are prosecuted in the District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.). Jurisdiction is statutory: “The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States.” (18 U.S.C. § 3231).

The district structure is set by 28 U.S.C. § 101 (law.cornell.edu): “Court shall be held at Boston, New Bedford, Springfield, and Worcester.” The First Circuit hears appeals from the District of Massachusetts, and the D. Mass. court website publishes local rules and case-location information.

Circuit assignment under 28 U.S.C. § 41: “First Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico , Rhode Island.”

White Collar Criminal Defense Cases in Boston

Federal white-collar prosecutions in Boston are filed in the District of Massachusetts and heard on appeal by the First Circuit. This page indexes the courts, statutes, and case-law resources that apply in Boston, as part of the research archive.

Mail & Wire Fraud

Schemes to defraud carried out through the mails or interstate wires. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343 — statutory text at law.cornell.edu.

Bank Fraud

Schemes to defraud financial institutions or obtain their property by false pretenses. 18 U.S.C. § 1344.

Securities Fraud

Misstatements, insider trading, and market manipulation prosecuted through SEC civil actions and parallel DOJ criminal cases.

Money Laundering & RICO

Financial transactions involving proceeds of specified unlawful activity, and racketeering prosecutions. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956, 1962.

Common Questions About White Collar Criminal Defense in Boston

Which court hears federal white-collar cases in Boston?

Federal fraud and other white-collar offenses arising in Boston are prosecuted in the District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.), established under 28 U.S.C. § 101. The statute provides: “Court shall be held at Boston, New Bedford, Springfield, and Worcester.” The First Circuit hears appeals from the District of Massachusetts.

Which federal statutes apply to white-collar cases in Boston?

The principal federal fraud statutes apply in every district, including the District of Massachusetts: mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), and bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344). Bank fraud carries a statutory maximum of 30 years: “shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.” (18 U.S.C. § 1344).

What is the statute of limitations for federal fraud offenses?

18 U.S.C. § 3282 provides the general five-year rule: “Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense, not capital, unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted within five years next after such offense shall have been committed.” For financial institution offenses, 18 U.S.C. § 3293 extends the period: “No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for a violation of, or a conspiracy to violate— (1) section 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1033, or 1344; (2) section 1341 or 1343, if the offense affects a financial institution; or (3) section 1963, to the extent that the racketeering activity involves a violation of section 1344; unless the indictment is returned or the information is filed within 10 years after the commission of the offense.”

Primary sources

Additional research notes are published as new court decisions are issued.

About the Research Desk

Whitecollardefensefirm is maintained as an editorial research archive for this topic. It summarizes public materials, case law, and statute-level references without offering intake or representation.

Editorial Policy

Every page is written in a neutral research voice. We do not publish attorney persona copy, client-matching language, fake reviews, or consultation CTAs.

Citations Notice

Case references, statute numbers, and procedural rules are cited where relevant. Readers should verify authorities before relying on any summary.